:)

:)

Friday, April 27, 2018

To ‘T’ or Not To ‘T’

I could not stop myself from expressing my thoughts when I came across an article that justified tracing, in a famous art magazine. Yes, the same tracing our Drawing and Biology teachers would frown upon and promptly give a ‘redo’ for. Tracing is basically copying a picture from its original source. As the name suggests, you just ‘trace’ the whole image without taking the pains of drawing it with hand along with all the aspects, measurements, shadow & light and of course, perspectives, a very important thing most people just do not care about. When we trace an image, we let our drawing skills take a backseat by cheating deliberately. All the skill then is required is that of coloring. In a way it is ‘manual photocopying’!

Advocates of tracing call it an absolute necessity for creating ‘hyper-realistic’ art. They state that many great painters traced too and also that end result matters and not the means, a point with which I absolutely refuse to concur. Art lies in the skill of the person, in his practice and dexterity to handle sketch and colors. Tracing is like writing an exam with guidebook open and then celebrating full scores. Yes, I consider it nothing more than plain stupidity and cheating the person appreciating and buying your art. It is said that the beauty of art lies in imperfection, there is no art sans it and I find no reason to disagree. In long run, tracing destroys an artist’s talent for the ability to recreate a photograph or a live thing or person accurately on paper which is used to gauge an artist.

To get to this final sketch of Daniel Craig as James Bond took me around nine or ten drafts. I never faced this much difficulty with any portrait but when after more than a week or so I got my base sketch correctly, I felt happy and proud of myself. This work may not be realistic or perfect but it is honest and has helped me brush up my art a bit more. Looking at my works give me inner peace and happiness, precisely for which I am into- fine-art.

Those masters who trace will surely lose their art in a few years while those novices who do so, unfortunately, will never get to develop the same in the first place. So, in my personal view, tracing is nothing more than suicide for an artist. Our Drawing and Biology teachers were indeed right.

By the way, I wonder if tracing is not cheating then what is?


6 comments:

  1. I know that face - one of my favorite actors and you drew him beautifully, Ankita.
    Tracing - a controversial subject. The great painter Johannes Vermeer was said to use the camera obscura, a 16th-17th century device used to project images of live models/objects onto canvas for accuracy. I don't know how many people still trace, but I think it is definitely cheating if you offer a piece of traced artwork for competition.
    That said, my mentor taught us that if you can't draw, you can't paint; it doesn't matter how accurate the traced drawing is because your drawing skills will be translated into your final painting whether you like it or not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Chris

      thank you for the thoughtful comment! I think your mentor was right, he who cannot draw lacks basic skills and cannot paint also. I agree, selling a traced artwork is cheating indeed.

      Delete
  2. You’re right about tracing or coping, which is unstable and nothing gives content like creating our own. I used to do painting ones and I couldn’t describe the feel after completing one and for me making the outline of portrait is difficult.

    Well done on the face of 007! I like his action

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jeevan

      Thank you for reading! Yes, honest art gives contentment that cannot be described! Thanks, I love Craig too :)

      Delete
  3. Quite good. Love it.

    ReplyDelete